| 10. |
Specifically, Respondent has
misappropriated the intellectual property of Karen
Cyson published in the March 2006 edition of Mensagenda, "Bad Day!
Sit! Stay!"
by publishing said article without the author's permission on his
rogue web site. |
| 11. |
Respondent erroneously
believes he has a contract that entitles him to continue
to act in violation of law. |
| 12. |
Respondents actions, in
illegally using Mensa's trademark and AML's copyrighted
material, through dilution and other reasons, constitute Actions
Inimical to Mensa. |
| 13. |
Respondent's actions, in
illegally using individual members' copyrighted material
constitute an act inimical to Mensa as this discourages the
individual member
from further publishing in Mensa publications for fear her
intellectual property will
be misappropriated. |
| 14. |
The Advocate requests a
speedy hearing as these violations are ongoing. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|