dehome@attglobal.net wrote:

> Al,

> I asked you not to e-mail me, since my computer is not working, your listening skills need work.

Looks to me like it's working just fine now, so that's OK.  (Hard to
"listen" to an e-mail, and that second comma should be a semicolon.)


> You were removed via section 12, that's all we needed.

But it's not all I need, and it is unacceptable.


> You can still fight and win section 13, but it will not change
> anything the fact that section 12 was already voted on. It's
> not an "and" kind of thing, it's an "or" type of thing.

Glad you agree on the "or" factor -- I formally invoke the recall
hearing provided for in Section 13, paragraph 3, the one that starts
with "Alternatively, ...".


> The board has already unanamously voted you down

Improperly, unfairly, without sufficient cause, and unacceptably.


> and appointed Jason Schmitz also unanamously.

Saying by appointment that Jason is the "next-best-qualified" to handle
our website is really sad. What kind of a search was made?

This is supposed to be a high-IQ organization.  On 7/27/02 I provided
all on the Board a massive itemized list of some of the omissions and
mistakes Jason has made on just the little AG2003 project.

Letting an unqualified person tamper with our website while a qualified
professional is already on board might be seen by some as calling into
question the collective wisdom and ability of the Board itself.


> The domain person, James Sheehan, is also not handing over the Web Site.

Anyone with the slightest knowledge of webmastering knows that a hosting
provider does not "hand over" a website.  If you mean changing hosting
providers, that's an inept idea -- there's no valid reason to do so.
Perhaps Jim has a good idea of who will eventually prevail.


>We are going to need our lawyer soon here.

Based on a number of my real-world experiences, that tends to be
ineffective and also to have unwelcome side effects.




Al Heigl - Webmaster - Minnesota Mensa