Al Heigl writes:
"I am rather shocked at the content of your letter, as your previous one
was worded so as to lead me to believe that the charges you mentioned
were (finally) being brought against those current and former board
members of Minnesota Mensa that have been maintaining a pattern of
non-cooperation with, and outright harassment of, me as Minnesota"
Mensa's Webmaster."

How anyone could take my statement in the first sentence from my letter
of May 10, 2006, "The Mensa Advocate, Guy Conti, has filed with my
committee the charges of acts inimical against you." as anything other
than YOU are the one being charged is beyond belief. What did you think
"against you" meant? It appears that not only do you ignore CERTIFIED
mail and take an unreasonablly long time to open regular mail you don't
read it with much attention to detail when you do finally open it.

You write,

"That would be interesting, if true, but I have no knowledge of this.
Please have a copy of the charges as filed, the purported "evidence",
and a copy of the policies/rules mailed to me ASAP. Preferably in an
envelope identifying itself as having to do with Mensa."

By copy of this I direct the National Office to send you ANOTHER copy of Mr Conti's submission.
Please open it when it arrives.

That all said and done the Hearings Committee will meet by phone at 1:30 pm on 9/16/06 to discuss
this case and reach a decision as previosuly stated.

Dave Remine, Chair National Hearings Committee